Results matching “fpö” from Countdown to Upheaval
An example of Islam’s terror in the context of the Austrian crisis
Death threat against FPÖ politician justifies her attack on Islam
FPÖ General Secretary Harald Vilimsky said Wednesday that the Islamic death threat against Graz FPÖ politician Susanne Winter had justified her Sunday attack on Islam.
Vilimsky added that the FPÖ was awaiting "a clear response" to the death threat from Austrian President Heinz Fischer and SPÖ Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer.
The party general secretary declared that he would not distance himself from Winter's remarks and that Austria needed a tougher policy against radical Islam.
Vilimsky called for additional security measures such as mandatory identification of each passport holder's religion in the holder's travel document, fingerprint data for persons with an Islamic background and creation of a special unit in the Federal Office for Protection of the Constitution and the Fight against Terrorism to combat terrorism.
Vilimsky claimed that it was "especially piquant" that a "phalanx" of representatives of other political parties and Austrian religious groups had distanced themselves from Winter but had had no response to death threats against her. Vilimsky called Fischer's failure to respond "shameful."
The FPÖ official added that the FPÖ had received more than 30 threats after Winter's speech and demanded that ÖVP Interior Minister Günther Platter "dismantle" all Islamic "cells" in Austria.
Leaders of the country's Islamic groups said they could not rule out "violent protests".
Translation: You know we are Good, law abiding moderate Islamic groups, but “we can’t guaranty there won’t be violent protest for the usual flag and car burnings, destructions and eventually killings.You know by now that our people are so emotional”.
It’s important to have an idea how Muslims are treated in their Muslim brother’s countries, to see if we extend to them the same brotherly treatment.
We hear a lot about the unity and brotherhood of Muslims within the Muslim Ummah. Ummah is the global Muslim community that is alleged to be devoid of national, ethnic, color barriers amongst all Muslims. Sounds fantastic, but is it really so? Are Muslims really united and do not discriminate amongst themselves? From what we know, they practice the worst form of discrimination amongst themselves. So what? you say, "there is discrimination in all parts of the globe". But it is our contention that Muslims, apart from the paranoid enmity they breed in their minds towards all non-Muslims, practice heinous discrimination amongst themselves.
Can any Muslim from the Ummah circulate or settle freely in any Arab or Islamic country? Does any country in the Arab world extend this facility to the Muslims? Sudanese, Egyptians, Moroccan, Pakistanis, Indonesians, Malaysians..etc.., go to their rich brethren to share in the petro-dollar led boom in the Gulf. How many of these fellow Muslims are allowed to settle down in countries like Saudi Arabia (the land of the religion of love), the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, and Kuwait. The answer is, in none of them! So much for the Ummah.
The Muslim brothers from other countries who go there in droves can only work there, and when they are out of work, they are repatriated to their country of origin. Why so? Why do not Muslim countries allow Muslim brothers to settle down in the oil rich countries of the Gulf?
Simple, because Muslims in general are the 1st to know that the most treacherous of beings is none other than another Muslim. They’re the first to know that their co-religionist immigrants, once they feel themselves at home, wouldn’t hesitate to stab them in the back at the first opportunity, cause flare-ups, divisions, deceptions, and can’t be trusted. They know that gratitude towards their benefactors has never been a Muslim virtue! And it was proven not very long ago. When Sadam Hussein invaded Kuwait, Palestinians and other Arabs living in Kuwait didn’t waste time joining Sadam’s troops and went on rampaging, looting, killing, and raping their own Kuwaiti’s benefactor’s women.
This is only one very obvious and fairly recent example. The lesson you should get out of that example is this: All these Muslim Arabs were living and acting as good and peaceful Muslim brothers with their Kuwaiti benefactors before Sadam’s invasion gave them the opportunity to express their hidden feelings. On the other hand, oil rich Arab Countries always treated their Muslim brethren not much more than slaves and they make sure their brethren never forget it.
Now imagine when these benefactors are non-Muslims, for whom Muslims have nothing but contempt due to their being brainwashed with hate since birth with teaching like Koran 9:123, "O ye who believe! Fight the Unbelievers, and let them find firmness in you: and know that Allah is with those who fear Him." I’ll leave you to meditate on that.
That verse like many others brings us to the one thing that unites Muslims all over the world, namely their hate for non-Muslims. It is only justified by the refusal of non-Muslims to believe in Mohammad which is considered to be the greatest insult that warrants their revenge. This is basically Mohammad’s doctrine (in the Koran): if you don’t gang with us, you are our enemy. The Western populations are outraged by Mohammad’s Mafia law of ”whoever leaves Islam kill him”, but they do nothing to combat the other core doctrine of Islam which stipulates clearly and literally, “kill or subjugate non -Muslims”.
Western populations create their own Muslim terrorists. Elephants and tigers don’t attract wolves, chicken do. When you act, with Muslims, like the "don’t see, don’t hear, don’t talk", and, "do unto others what you want others to do unto you", you have already created terrorists in your midst. A Muslim is indoctrinated to have the mind of a predator. He knows that you know that his “religion” tells him to deceive you and kill you if you’re not willingly subdued and pay him the jeziah (extortion). All acts of extending a friendly hand or helping him are viewed as signs of your weakness, and pleading with him not to hurt you doesn't help. It’s like a chicken pleading with a hyena or a wolf that she is peaceful, friendly and wants to help. Nothing makes a vicious dog or a predator more vicious and ferocious than running away from him. Once he sees you running away, you’re already dead meat for him .. his meal. All that Western governments have been doing since 911 is pleading with Muslims in the West not to hurt them, and Western populations are running away from the no-go-zones Muslims are creating in their cities. In French they call it "fuite en avant". Can anyone deny that?
More effective and radical, than all the trillions of dollars dedicated for weapons to fight Islamic terrorism everywhere in the world, and protect Western countries from internal Islamic terrorist cells, which will never stop neither one, is to treat Muslims according to what they cherish most, their Koran and Shari’a law. Muslims wants to apply Islam on us, so let’s act with them as Muslims and apply Islam on them. The golden rule with Muslims is "do unto others as they would do unto you". Don’t all Muslims praise Saudi Arabia and are proud of it? let’s give them more of what they love and treat them the same as Saudi Arabia treats them.
The ultimate mockery is played on us from our Western Governments. Mr. Bush (who was just deservedly honored by the Saudi Wahabi’s) and most Western officials, tell us that the Muslim terrorists hijacked and corrupted a great religion. But when they catch those hijackers and put them in jails, whether in Guantanamo or anywhere else, why do they provide them with the same Koran that assumingly they misinterpreted instead of other books that show them the correct interpretations to lead them on the right path?
It’s a gigantic masquerade and you’re the ones set to be the prey and collateral damage on the altar of the all mighty Wahabi oil lobby. Same as the deception they drill into your brain, that we have to be nice to Islam and let Saudi Arabia spread their hate and terror Ideology in our Universities and schools, and corrupt even our history, because we need their oil. Have you ever asked yourself; if Arabs don’t sell their oil, what they’re gone do with it? Drink it? Do they have any other source for their bread and butter?
Let’s play a mind game and Suppose Arabs play nasty and decide not to sell us their oil. Then we retaliate by putting an embargo on just three items we sell them: food products, technology, and medicines and medical equipment. Anyone would doubt that this would be enough to send them back to the roots of their great civilization and the lifestyle of their beloved “master of the universe”, living in tents, raising goats and robbing caravans. The only guess would be on the number of years it would take them to be exterminated with their own Islamic medicine: Camel urine and fly wings.
Islamic terrorism ideology is not the work of a corrupted mind of an individual Muslim. It’s the Islamic countries' doctrine, and they strive by all means not only to spread it but to protect it fiercely.
The bible is banned in Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries. Have you ever asked yourself why? Regardless of whether you’re a Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, or atheist, this is not the point. The answer doesn’t need a PhD scholar in comparative religions. The whole bible can be summarized in two commandments. "Love the Lord your God with all your heart soul and mind, and love your neighbor as yourself. For on these two commandments hand all the law and the prophets." [JC1] Another foundational teaching of the Bible is the Golden Rule, which states, "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." Do you understand now why the bible is considered the mortal enemy in Islamic countries that should be banned? “Elementary my dear Watson” as Sherlock Holmes would’ve said, just those two commandment
A few years ago on several occasions in France, I happened to come across members of Parti du Front National headed by Jean Marie Le Pen. Knowing the history and the actions of the Front National from the time of L'Algerie Francaise, any observant would realize that the strength that the Far-Right parties can yield on the ground far exceeds their numerical representations on the political scene. Even before 911, Islam was a top priority on their radar screen. No one should doubt the resolve of these parties to get active in what they consider liberating their lands from Arab occupation.
Their meeting yesterday sends a very significant message, and strengthens their existing close ties for a better coordination. These developments shouldn't be underestimated by Muslims in Europe, especially in light of the threats to Susanne Winter from Muslims yesterday, if they don't want to provoke a reaction that definitely wouldn't be to their advantage.
Far-right groups are calling for a ban on the building of new mosques as part of a new campaign to stop the spread of radical Islam in Europe.
Antwerp (AFP)
Belgium's far-right Vlaams Belang party teamed up with radical groups from Austria and Germany on Thursday to launch a Charter to 'fight the Islamisation of West-European cities'.
"We are not opposed to freedom of religion but we don't want Muslims to impose their way of life and traditions over here because much of it is not compatible with our way of life," Vlaams Belang's Filip Dewinter told Radio Netherlands Worldwide. "We can't accept headscarves in our schools, forced marriages and the ritual slaughter of animals."
Mosques as catalysts
In particular, the coalition called for a moratorium on new mosques, which they say "act as catalysts for the Islamisation of entire neighbourhoods."
"We already have over 6,000 mosques in Europe, which are not only a place to worship but also a symbol of radicalisation, some financed by extreme groups in Saudi Arabia or Iran," Mr Dewinter explained, citing a large new mosque being built in the Dutch port city of Rotterdam. "Its minarets are six floors high, higher than the illuminations of the Feyenoord soccer stadium!" he cried. "These kinds of symbols have to stop."
However, it is unclear how the group plans to tackle perceived threats such as the teaching of the Koran, apart from holding rallies in European cities with high immigrant populations.
No support
Aside from Austria's Freedom Party (FPö), there was a notable absence of other political heavyweights during the press conference in the Flemish city of Antwerp. A spokesman for Italy's Allianza Nazionale said he was unaware of the Charter, though his party too was looking at the issue of the new mosques. Dutch right-wing maverick politician Geert Wilders, who is currently producing a film about the danger of the Koran, also stayed away.
But Mr Dewinter seems unruffled by the paltry political support: "This movement may be small today but I am convinced it will grow into something major."
Dismay
News of the Charter was greeted with dismay in Antwerp's Borgerhout, a multi-cultural neighbourhood counting over 90 nationalities.
"It's pure provocation," shrugged Said El Fetri, a Moroccan shopkeeper. "I have Belgians, East Europeans, Jews and Muslims coming in and out of my shop, there are no problems with integration here." Standing next to his counter of Halal meat, he added: "I am a Muslim but that doesn't mean that I don't live by the rules of this country."
However, another local shopkeeper, Mohammed, was gloomier: "I've lived here for almost 40 years. Me and my children are perfectly integrated but these kinds of campaigns worry me. In ten years' time, it won't be possible for us to live side by side like this anymore."
Preaching peace
Some worshippers coming out of prayer at Belgium's biggest mosque in Brussels, meanwhile, were alarmed that their place of worship was being singled out. "Mosques are places where we preach peace," said Fatimah, a student in her early twenties. "Everyone has the right to have a space to pray and be spiritual. Catholics have churches, Jews synagogues, we have mosques. This is what helps us feel part of this country, not separate from it."
Counter charter
Last week, the Federation of Islamic Organisations in Europe (FIOE) launched its own Charter to promote better understanding of Islam in Europe. It was signed in Brussels by Muslim organisations from 28 European states with the aim to "enhance the values of mutual understanding, working for peace and the welfare of society, moderation and inter-cultural dialogue, removed from all inclinations of extremism and exclusion."
What any decent person would say when a 53 years old man has sexual relations with a six, or even nine years old girl? "He's a sicko". Even in the animal world, we don't see 5 years old pigs having sex with 6 months old little piggy's. But Muslims call this "marriage made in heaven".
What's the legal term used for such a sicko? He's a pedophile, a child molester who should be put behind bars and out of circulation. But Muslims have different standards: they worship him and call him, " The most honorable prophet, the master of Allah's creation".
Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64 Narrated ‘Aisha: the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
Head of Graz FPÖ list calls Mohammed 'a child molester'.
Graz FPÖ politician Susanne Winter lhas attacked Islam as a religion at her party's New Year's meeting in the Styrian capital.
Winter, who is head of the FPÖ's list for the January 20 municipal, election, called Islamic prophet Mohammed "a child molester“ because of his alleged marriage to a six-year-old girl and "a field marshal" who had written the Koran during "epileptic fits."
She termed Islam "a totalitarian system of domination that should be thrown back to its birthplace on the other side of the Mediterranean."
Winter added on Monday "There is widespread abuse of children among Muslim men,“ but then declared that she didn't want to offend anyone or insult any religion.
She also defended her Sunday statement saying, "a Muslim immigration tsunami“ could occur. "In 20 or 30 years, half the population of Austria will be Muslim" if the SPÖ and ÖVP's immigration policy continues in effect, she said.
In response, the Community of Islamic Believers official responsible for integration, Omar Al-Rawi, called Winter's remarks an instance of "lack of respect" and "false." He claimed that "Islam-bashing" had reached a “sickening and evil" level.
Community spokeswoman Carla Amina Baghajati added on Monday that Winter's remarks were a threat to social peace. [Coded threat, and calls for the thugs of Allah to get to work]
“Dialogue is very important to us (with the sons of apes and pigs). [Emphasis added].
But that kind of hatred and promotion of images of enemies will make it more difficult. It threatens to poison the climate,“ she said.
Baghajati added that FPÖ statements were more and more "unappetising, provocative and disrespectful."(Especially when it comes from the sons and daughters of apes and pigs). [Emphasis added].<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
